This is another revision of an earlier review I made. This time, however, my opinion of the movie was greatly changed on my rewatch. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, a television movie from HBO, is based on Dee Brown’s famous history of the fall of the American Indians in the latter half of the 19th Century. Brown’s book is too widely focused to make a single movie, so HBO limited itself to the story of the Sioux, from their last great victory at Little Bighorn to the fallout of the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890, charting their decline from a proud warrior people on the western plains to dependents on a reservation. Overall it’s a pretty accurate film, but accuracy does not always translate into a great movie.
The movie tries for a balanced account of events, though both of the primary protagonists are Sioux Indians. The first is Charles Eastman (Adam Beach). Eastman is the biggest inaccuracy of the movie. As in real life he has a Sioux father who converted to Christianity and changed his name to Jacob Eastman. For a while Charles, as Ohiyesa, lived with his mother’s people, but they were not part of the group under Sitting Bull, so Eastman’s presence at Little Bighorn is completely fictional. He was put in a mission school before having an American education program. Though the movie doesn't have him go to one of the controversial boarding schools, it still shows how Indian children were made to abandon their cultural heritage, down to adopting western names. The movie gets inaccurate with Eastman again, however, in giving him a close relationship with Henry Dawes which didn't exist, and also making him figure more in the other Sioux's lives earlier in the timeline.
What is true is that he was the first American Indian to master western medicine and became a doctor on the Great Sioux Reservation. At least in the movie his character is torn between two worlds. He can’t help but sympathize with his own people but also has a friendship with Senator Henry Dawes (Aidan Quinn) and a romantic relationship with poet and future wife Elaine Goodale (Anna Paquin, who played Rogue in the X-Men films). By the end of the movie he has grown disgusted with health conditions on the reservation as well as the misguided aspects of the Dawes Act, which forced the Sioux to become farmers and also sell off more of their already shrunken lands. Eastman was not present for most of the events in the movie and certainly did not have as many personal interactions with other major characters, but he is used to show the tensions the Sioux face between preserving some of their culture and adopting the whites’ ways.
I’m more fascinated by Chief Sitting
Bull (August Schellenberg), the last leader of the Sioux to resist white
encroachment. He actually escapes with his people to Canada, where he and his
people are allowed to live in peace, but lack of food and medicine forces him
to finally go to the reservation in South Dakota and surrender. Not allowed to
serve as a leader by the US government, he makes a living as a celebrity, signing
autographs and taking photos in return for money. Those Sioux who want to
actively resist the Dawes Act are frustrated that he prefers to live his own
life peaceably. Eventually he takes a stand and the Sioux gravitate around him
as a symbol of resistance. He’s a sympathetic and likable figure, but oddly
enough the movie gives him an inaccurate ugly moment where he whips one of his
own people for stealing a horse from other Indians in Canada. While the Sioux
could be vicious to outsiders, they never treated their own people so harshly.
Sitting Bull (August Schellenberg in the left foreground) with some of his top warriors
Speaking of Canada, the movie shows the moment when Major James
Walsh, a Royal Mountie, rode straight into Sitting Bull’s refugee camp and
clearly laid out the terms that would allow them to live on British-held soil.
The movie doesn’t delve too deep into Walsh and his relationship with the
Sioux, but it is true that the Canadians were much fairer in their dealings
with American Indians during this period.
The
film boasts several other interesting characters. Henry Dawes is a senator who
seeks to rescue the American Indian by turning him into a civilized farmer.
He’s well-meaning, but out of touch with the character of the Sioux. His offers
to give the Sioux private farms and millions of dollars for the rest of their
land do not take into account that their children will no longer have territory
to expand into when they leave their parents, and also ignores the fact that
some might not be cut out for farming at all. He represents the progressives
who, to paraphrase, tried to “save the man by killing the Indian.”
The film sometimes has transitions utilizing
19th-Century looking photographs. Here's
one with Aidan Quinn as Henry Dawes.
Of course, almost any major film with American Indians is
required to feature Wes Studi in a role. Here he portrays Wovoka, the medicine
man who taught the new ghost dance that would supposedly make the white man
disappear. One character who’s gotten attention is Colonel Nelson Miles. He’s
only in the first act where he avenges the death of Custer by defeating Sitting
Bull. He stands out for a scene where he points out that
the Sioux aren’t quite the pure-hearted people that they imagine themselves to
be and are in fact guilty of some of the very actions that they criticize the
United States for.
The
movie’s first act sees the end of the last war between the Sioux and the United
States. This includes a small part of Little Bighorn, when Arikara scouts
attached to Custer’s 7th Cavalry, stormed into the Sioux and
Cheyenne camp. After this there’s a pretty good long shot that ends in the
visual of Indians riding around the US troopers on Last Stand Hill. The Cedar Creek Valley Fight where the Sioux lose, however, if pretty bad because somehow twenty extras playing American troops are able to curb stomp a ton of Sioux warriors from a downhill position. We then get
to the reservation. There’s a bit of necessary time-skipping but we see how
conditions for the Sioux have degraded. The government is inefficient in
bringing in medicine and other goods. Dr. Eastman finds himself doling out cod
liver oil more than any other medicine because it contains alcohol. Attempts to
implement the Dawes Act are stonewalled by Red Cloud, Sitting Bull, and other
prominent figures. Tensions finally climax with the death of Sitting Bull and
the Wounded Knee Massacre.
And here is a good time to discuss the main problem with this
movie. Two hours is a good length for a movie, but a three hour two-parter or a
fuller miniseries would have worked much better. Outside of Charles Eastman the
movie is very accurate, but almost everything happens too fast. Thus it’s hard
to get emotionally invested in most of the scenes without the proper pacing. It
would also have been nice to see Sitting Bull tour with Buffalo Bill’s Wild West
show, but we only get a brief mention during one of the chief’s antagonistic
interactions with the infamous Indian Bureau agent James McLaughlin (J.K.
Simmons). McLaughlin tries to assert dominance by telling Sitting Bull that he
can’t go on any more such trips. Actually Sitting Bull was the one who made the
decision and McLaughlin was disappointed because he thought it would properly
Americanize the chief.
| The casting of President Ulysses S. Grant and General William Tecumseh Sherman for one scene is a little off despite the talent used. Fred Thompson plays Grant and Colm Feore Sherman (pictured above) |
The death of Sitting Bull and the bloodbath at Wounded Knee are
accurately shown, but only as quick flashbacks via one of the wounded patients
Eastman treats (this time Eastman’s interaction is historical. He saved most of
the 38 wounded Sioux brought to him). For a movie with Wounded Knee in the
title, I expect more, and Sitting Bull’s death is also way too quick
considering he was one of the primary characters.
Overall Bury My Heart at
Wounded Knee is a decent, tragic film which shows how the position of
American Indians has declined (and still has not improved much when it comes to
the reservations). There is a bit of a hope spot at the end, but it’s not
much. It's definitely sympathetic to the Sioux, but is able to show some
balance in depicting events and characters. Also, unlike many HBO productions
there isn’t a bunch of nudity (aside from the grisly stripped corpses of
Custer’s men) and little to no profanity. If one is okay with the few gory bits
this can safely be shown in school, but don’t expect anything too stellar.
Rating:
6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment