Showing posts with label richard taylor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label richard taylor. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

Donald Frazier's Louisiana Quadrille

  Frazier, Donald. Fire in the Cane Field: The Federal Invasion of Louisiana and Texas, January 1861-January 1863. State House Press, 2009.
-        Thunder Across the Swamp: The Fight for the Lower Mississippi, February 1863-May 1863. State House Press, 2011.
-          Blood on the Bayou: Vicksburg, Port Hudson, and the Trans-Mississippi. State House Press, 2015.
-          Tempest over Texas: The Fall and Winter Campaigns of 1863-1864. State House Press, 2020.

 

Those looking for an extensive history of Civil War Louisiana might be interested to know that there is a highly readable four-volume series on the subject. Donald Frazier’s Louisiana Quadrille (he actually chose to expand it to five books so it’s really a Pendadrille) covers the Trans-Mississippi theatre in East Texas and Louisiana from the secession crisis to right before the more widely known and infamous Red River Campaign of spring 1864. Frazier’s work here comes out of Blood & Treasure, the story of the Sibley Brigade’s attempt to conquer the Far West. Looking further into this unit’s history, he came upon a series of little known battles. As a native Texan, Frazier was inspired to dig deeper. He has brought to light a heavily overlooked part of the Civil War. Frazier covers a wide area of the war, but shows a particular interest in the fields and swamps of western Louisiana.

Taken together the books look like heavy reading (Thunder in the Swamp runs well over 500 pages). However the text is not all that thick and there are plenty of illustrations and maps. The latter shows the author’s exhaustive searches for visual sources to enhance his narrative. The one main gripe has nothing to do with Frazier’s investigation and presentation of information. He displays a surprising amount of grammatical errors, moreso in his first volume. I myself am guilty of having typos and errors in my blog posts (even after reading through what I wrote). Still it’s a bit surprising for a professionally published book. Perhaps he attempted to edit the whole thing himself. This is forgivable, however, in light of the value of his research. He really digs into primary sources and many of the figures, especially the soldiers of the rank-and-file, come alive with extensive quotes and references from their letters and journals.