Monday, January 27, 2020

Ten World War II Films to Watch


No war has gotten more time on theater screens than World War II. With its all-encompassing nature, diverse cast of characters and battles, and for many relatively clearer tale of good against evil, it makes for a very attractive cinematic subject. Also, being so recent, there is still plenty of original gear to use from tanks to uniforms to guns. That certainly saves filmmakers the trouble of building replicas from scratch. With so many World War II films out there, I thought I’d make a list of ten great films. This is not a list of the top ten films, though I only chose ones I consider to be at the least very good. I have tried to make a list that covers various aspects from the Holocaust to partisan warfare to the Nazi hierarchy. If you want to learn some history through movies, than watch these ten.

Before starting the list I have to recommend HBO’s Band of Brothers and The Pacific. They’re mini-series, not movies, but they are must-see due to their accuracy. I should also note that I only include films based directly on real people or events, so no Saving Private Ryan or one of those special mission action films like Dirty Dozen.

#1: City of Life and Death (2009)
Image result for city of life and death (2009)
The Sino-Japanese War does not get much play in Western film. There are plenty of Chinese movies on the subject, but they're hard to track down or rife with propaganda. One sub-topic that has lent itself well to film is the Rape of Nanking. In late 1937 the Japanese captured the Chinese capital of Nanking and embarked on one of the greatest streaks of terror in human history. At least tens of thousands of Chinese civilians were slaughtered, often with torturous methods. Almost as many women, ranging from young girls to the elderly, were raped, and many of these victims were killed afterwards. It’s a war crime matching and usually exceeding any incident in Hitler’s war with Russia.

I have seen three films on the Rape of Nanking. There’s the German John Rabe, which is just okay. The Sino-American production Flowers of War is a good small story set within the greater event. But Lu Chuan’s City of Life and Death is the one that captures the real scale of the atrocity. It is filmed in black and white in order to make the violent images more palatable, because there are a lot. There are scenes of soldiers sexually assaulting women. There is one notable sequence in which Chinese POWs are mowed down by machines guns, bayoneted, and burned alive. The film captures the long, horrid slog of the Rape of Nanking. Character-wise, it doesn’t spend much time on the Europeans and Americans who helped rescue thousands of Chinese from death in the Civilian Safety Zone. It prefers to focus more on the Chinese themselves. Also, with some controversy in China, Lu Chuan decided to feature a sympathetic Japanese soldier. This character is actually one of the more interesting elements of the film. He doesn’t participate in the crimes, but finds himself too powerless to do anything to oppose them, leading to an overwhelming sense of guilt.

Overall, City of Life and Death is a grim film, but only scratches the surface of what happened in the Rape of Nanking. That should tell you something about the scale of what really happened.

Relevant Recommendation: City of Flowers


#2: Tora! Tora! Tora! (1971)
 Image result for tora tora tora
Forget Michael Bay’s Pearl Harbor. This is the definitive cinematic account of the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. One of many three-hour battle epics from the 60s and 70s, Tora is a joint American-Japanese venture. The American scenes were filmed by Richard Fleischer and the Japanese by Toshio Masuda and Kinji Fukasaku. They were then edited together to make what is a near-documentary of real events. Actors were chosen more for their physical similarities and ability to portray a certain character than for star power, a departure from other epics such Longest Day and A Bridge Too Far (cinephiles will still recognize many of the names and faces among the American cast, but there’s nobody on the level of a John Wayne or Sean Connery).

There’s no attempt to create any emotional drama outside of the basics of what happened in late 1941. The film does a great job of quickly setting up why Japan and America would go to war. It takes its time getting to the attack, showing the strategizing and practice of the Japanese Navy as it prepares its airstrike. The American scenes show how military intelligence did predict an attack, but failed to nail down when and where. The attack itself is marvelous. It’s not as slick as Michael Bay’s version, but it’s almost a hundred percent accurate. A couple of the special effects are still amazing today. One example is a flaming Japanese plane smashing into a hangar. They really used a remote-controlled plane and flew it into a life-sized set rigged with explosives!

Tora! Tora! Tora! is one of those movies that you can safely use to teach history with some suspense and excitement.


Relevant Recommendation: Midway (2019)


#3: Schindler’s List (1993)
Image result for schindler's list
Of course this list needs a holocaust film, and why not one that’s actually about a list? Schindler’s List gave Steven Spielberg his only Oscar for best picture and his first for best director. It tells the story of Oskar Schindler (Liam Neeson), a German businessman and member of the Nazi party who went to conquered Poland to start up a profitable business. Over time he came to sympathize with the Jews and worked to rescue as many as he could from execution and the concentration camps. Originally out to make a buck, he sacrificed his business and his wealth and saved over a thousand Jews.

Schindler’s List is filmed almost entirely in black and white to give it a documentary feel. Also, as with City of Life and Death, this helps viewers get through some of the unpleasant scenes. Among these are the liquidation of the Krakow ghetto, a long and violent sequence in which civilians are rounded up or discarded like pests, and the exhuming of the liquidation’s victims, which are dug out of the ground and burned in piles. Thankfully, the film does have an optimistic tone under it all, with a happy if bittersweet conclusion. Liam Neeson does a good job as Oskar Schindler and Ben Kingsley just as well as Izthak Stern, his moral conscience. Ralph Fiennes as SS Commandant Amon Goth might come across as cartoonishly evil, but his portrayal is actually toned down from reality.

Schindler’s List is a great holocaust film not only for showing the horror of what happened, but providing hope and relief.


Relevant Recommendation: The Pianist (2002)

#4: To End All Wars (2001)
 Image result for to end all wars 2001
Prisoner of war films make up their own sub-genre within the WWII filmography. There’s Stalag 17, The Great Escape, Hart’s War, and others. One based more on real life is To End All Wars. It covers the experiences of British soldiers taken in the Battle of Singapore and brought to a Japanese prisoner of war camp in 1941. The Japanese believed that to surrender rather than die was a dishonorable and cowardly act. Thus they showed utter contempt for POWs and treated them cruelly. The camp in the film is one of many that provided slave labor for the Burma Railway, an effort by the Japanese to enable the flow of troops and supplies across its Southeast Asian conquests.

To End All Wars got mixed reviews and I don’t understand why. It’s a far more honest portrayal of camp conditions that Bridge on the River Kwai (an overrated movie in my opinion) and it does a good job of showing how various people coped with the hellish conditions of a Japanese POW camp. The main character, Captain Ernest Gordon, starts an underground university in order to uphold the dignity of the inmates and keep them from devolving into savages. Others resort to questionable methods to survive. Even the Japanese running the camp are shown to have depth of character. The Japanese ditched undesirable soldiers into the comparatively dishonorable role of running the camps. Takashi Nagasse, a real-life figure who also appeared in Railway Man, is a sympathetic interpreter who is considered too physically weak for combat while Sergeant Ito is a first-rate soldier, only there because he took the blame for his superior’s mistake. To End All Wars further has a positive portrayal of religion that is often absent from other war films, which usually don’t dwell on it.

So if you want a POW film based more on true events, this is one to check out.

Relevant Recommendation: The Railway Man

#5: Stalingrad (1993)
 Image result for stalingrad 1993
Stalingrad, the turning point in the clash between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, was the bloodiest battle of World War Two and the bloodiest in all of human history. Over a million lives were lost and that doesn’t include all the wounded and shattered lives. However it did not involve Americans so is hasn’t received much in the way of an epic film treatment. I’ve seen three films from three different countries. Hollywood’s Enemy at the Gates does the best at capturing the scale of the battle, but is hindered by boring characters and myth-perpetuating inaccuracies. The Russian Stalingrad is so-so and suffers from war film clichés. The best by far is the German Stalingrad.

Stalingrad follows a squad of characters who are transferred from North Africa to Russia. It’s not much of an action film, with only two sizeable battle sequences. More time is spent fighting the Russian winter as well as the environmental horrors of fighting in a city. There is also tension between the Wehrmacht characters and an SS officer. This does lead to my one criticism, which is that the film somewhat perpetuates the idea that the regular rank-and-file German soldier was not culpable for atrocities. Naturally, the film is grim and depressing as it was made by the country who lost the battle and the war.

Stalingrad is not just a good film for looking at conditions on the Eastern Front. It in general shows the nasty situations soldiers across history have had to deal with, and why traditionally armies don’t campaign in the winter.

Relevant Recommendation: Cross of Iron (1977)

#6: Come and See (1985)
 Image result for come and see 1985
This Russian film isn’t as well known in popular culture, but those who have seen it consistently rank it as one of the best, if not the best, war films of all time. It was directed by Elem Kilimov, who actually lived through the war and had to use a raft to escape the Battle of Stalingrad. Unusually, this film was made during the Soviet era and for the fortieth anniversary of victory, but it’s much more honest and less propagandized than any other Russian film I’ve seen. The story follows a boy in 1943 Belorussia who eagerly joins the partisans to fight behind German lines. He is soon mentally and physically transformed by the horrors of war.

Come and See is so accurate, even with some quirky beats and surrealistic filmmaking techniques, that it comes off as a horror movie. But it’s horror that actually happened, so it does not even serve the purpose of escapism. This makes for an intense and terrifying film-viewing experience. The climax is a lengthy scene showing the destruction of a Belorussian village. It happens so naturally that you get a sense of what it would be like to have an invading force walk into your town and start killing, raping, and looting. By the way, the hammy behavior of many of the Germans is only a slight exaggeration, as verified by veterans and survivors of wartime Belorussia.

Come and See is the most uncompromising look at World War II. There is no moment in the film that makes one think it might be cool to participate in a war. The war is still justified for the Russians because the Germans are trying to wipe them out, but it is no glorious endeavor. It is thus the strongest anti-war film and will make anyone think twice before risking such conflict.

Relevant Recommendation: Defiance (2008)

#7: Patton (1970)
 Image result for patton 1970
Patton is an epic biographical film starring George C. Scott as the controversial General George S. Patton. Scott’s portrayal is iconic, so much so that people who read history imagine Scott’s gruff voice as opposed to Patton’s actual squeaky tones. One critic labeled the film a “Rorschach Test” thanks to its ambiguity. Patton can be interpreted as a great hero or glory-hounding bastard. The American war effort can be seen as a heroic endeavor or a disgusting involvement in violence. Thus almost everybody can appreciate this film, as it never veers into heroic or anti-war propaganda, riding the perfect fine line in-between.

Aside from delving into Patton’s character, the film also shows the development of America’s military involvement. At the start of the film it’s having trouble facing up with Rommel’s experienced Afrika Korps. By the end it’s leading the charge through France into Germany. The movie’s primary focus isn’t battle scenes. In fact much of what was filmed in this area was cut out. But what’s there is done well. One criticism viewers may have is the scenes of Germans constantly wondering what Patton is up to and declaring him America’s best general. Recent scholarship has shown that Patton was not quite that especially feared.

Patton doubles as a great portrayal of history and as a deep character study.

Relevant Recommendation: The Gallant Hours (1960)

#8: The Longest Day (1962)
                                                                                                         
I debated whether to include this or A Bridge Too Far. Ultimately I went with The Longest Day because not only is it more of a classic but it covers a more pivotal event. Operation Overlord was the successful opening of a new front in Europe that hastened the end of the war. A large Allied force stormed the beaches of Normandy in France. German resistance was much lighter than it could have been as Hitler and his generals had been successfully tricked into anticipating an Allied invasion further northeast at Calais.

The Longest Day, one of the great war epics of older Hollywood, looks at Operation Overlord from both Allied and German perspectives. The characters are played by a long list of well-known 60s actors and for cinephiles it’s fun to identify major stars in small roles, especially a couple German actors that would later pop up as James Bond villains. The film plays out like a documentary (even incorporating bits of real footage), but with a heavy dose of action scenes. The action itself is pretty impressive, though as an older movie it’s a far cry from the realistic bloodbath of Saving Private Ryan. There are night-time skirmishes between Allied paratroopers and behind-the-lines Germans and of course the long fight at Omaha Beach, but my personal favorite is a town battle near the end with an amazing long crane shot.

The Longest Day is an epic semi-documentary that is both heavily informative and entertainingly action-packed. Also, being an older movie without the blood spurts and dismemberment, it's a good tool for introducing history to your children.

Relevant Recommendation: A Bridge Too Far (1978)

#9: Letters from Iwo Jima (2006)
 Letters from Iwo Jima.jpg
Letters from Iwo Jima is the second half of Clint Eastwood’s Iwo Jima duology. While Flags of our Fathers focused on the American marines who raised the flag on Mount Suribachi, Letters from Iwo Jima gives a rare view of the Japanese perspective. Ken Watanabe stars as General Kuribayashi, the only Japanese general to inflict more casualties on the marines than received (though in death tolls the Japanese still suffered far worse). Kuribayashi had actually been to America and thus was one of the few Japanese generals to break free from the Imperial Army's rigid tactical doctrine. Unfortunately, many of his subordinates still believed in traditional tactics borne out of a distorted view of the warrior spirit. This is a major point of conflict in the film.

The actual central character is Private Saigo, who just wants to live and doesn’t understand why everyone should sacrifice themselves so recklessly. His and other characters’ stories are fleshed out with various flashbacks that show how the Japanese soldiers themselves are victims of the militant Japanese culture. Eastwood successfully makes most of the action scenes non-cathartic. It’s a dark fact that even realistically violent battle scenes can often produce catharsis among the viewers, even though they know what they are seeing is horrible and happened to real people. The greatest achievement of course is giving a perspective of the Pacific War that is lost even in much of scholarly history. Thanks to a paucity of survivors and unfathomable (to westerners) tactics, the Japanese are usually portrayed as a screaming horde, almost part of the hostile tropical landscape. Letters from Iwo Jima rectifies this and reminds moviegoers that the Japanese were just as human, even if their society and culture had moved them into a dark, violent place.

Relevant Recommendation: Battle of Okinawa (1971)

#10: Downfall (2004)
 Image result for downfall
Closing off this list is a German film by Oliver Hirschbiegel. Partially based on the recollections of Hitler’s secretary Traudl Junge (who is a character in the film), it covers the last days of Adolf Hitler’s life as well as the fall of Berlin in general. As with many films on this list, it is almost unremittingly dark. Watching a city collapse is not pleasant, even when most of the players are Nazis and war criminals. Expect to see a lot of suicides in the last act. While dark, it is fascinating to see the inner workings of the Nazi party, which maintained its unique flavor even as its dream crumbled.

Bruno Ganz turns in an amazing performance of Hitler, refusing to turn him into a caricature. Realistically he is shown to have his tender moments, especially towards his dogs. Ironically his most well-known scene is a certain rant that has been turned into an internet meme. It is a bit unfortunate that this happened, since this is the critical moment when Hitler finally accepts reality, that there is no hope and he has lost the war. Hopefully those familiar with the meme can separate it from the original source. Ulrich Matthes’ performance as Joseph Goebbels is also praiseworthy. He not only looks a lot like the minister of propaganda, but nails his obsessive hero-worship of the Fuhrer. In addition to Hitler’s inner circle are a few military and civilian characters who deal with events happening outside the bunker.

Downfall captures the chaos and tragedy amidst the Third Reich’s last days and should be viewed by anyone interested in a German perspective.

Relevant Recommendation: Conspiracy (2001)

So there you have it, ten films worth watching to get an overview of World War II without reading a lot of books, though I always encourage people to dig deeper if they're interested.

2 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing this list. I guess for this type of movie, mainly the ones I've seen have been oscar movies. So I know I've seen Schindler's List as well as the "Relevant Recommendation" with Schinler's List(The Pianist). Although I think "The Pianist" was from 2002 not 2004.

    I know for a long time, Patton was on my list as one of the "most recent" best picture oscars that I hadn't seen. I'm not sure if I finally watched it or not. I suppose I would probably remember if I had..

    You got me reading a little more about Schindler's list in wikipedia and I noticed something I hadn't known, that Oskar Schindler was born into a Sudeten German family. All of my dad's paternal grandparents were also Sudeten Germans(His maternal grandparents were ethnic Germans from what is now Slovenia and was Austria-Hungary). My great-grandparents were born in Ronsberg, Austria-Hungary(now Poběžovice, Czech Republic) only about 15 miles from Germany a lot further west than where Schindler was from.

    The three links below are from a handwritten letter that I have. It is from some Stadick relation about when he was in the US Army after WWII and going thru that area. The US Army was going thru Czechoslovakia as fast as they could to gain control of as much area as they could before the Russians got to it. This Stadick relation new that some of his ancestors were from Ronsberg/Poběžovice so he was trying to do a little geneology research why quickly moving thru the area with the US Army. One story talks about the guy about hand his gunbelt to a girl to have his picture taken with a family member when he was told that she would probably shoot him if he handed her the gunbelt. The story is probably exaggerated some, it is hard to believe someone in the US Army would hand his gunbelt to anyone. But interesting how particularly the Sudeten Germans weren't necessarily happy control of Czechoslovakia going to Allied forces..

    http://townoak.com/stadick/0605/th_p7.jpg
    http://townoak.com/stadick/0605/th_p8.jpg
    http://townoak.com/stadick/0605/th_p9.jpg

    edstadick@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Ed, thanks for the links! My family was barely involved in World War II so I always get a little envious reading about other family histories. My dad's side of the family came from Czechoslovakia as well, though they were Bohemians, not Germans. Poland also had an ethnic German population that actually experienced some murders and persecution in the build-up to WWII (giving Hitler a moral pretext for war, if an exaggerated one). It must be fascinating to learn what one's extended family was up to during a major event. There's lots of personal stories still to be discovered.

      Delete